Disposed¶12

Kashmir Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2025NA528/25171/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, 18.7.2025, Appn. U/S 528 BNSS No. 25171 of 2025, Kashmir Singh v. State of U.P.: speedy-disposal direction for Sessions Trial 77/2022 (case crime 130/2021; IPC ss. 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 307, 504, 506; P.S. जरनवेर, Agra) pending before District & Sessions Judge, Agra; trial to be concluded on priority with enforcement of parties' attendance; certified copy to trial court; application disposed.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed in effect: directions issued to the District and Sessions Judge, Agra to conclude Sessions Trial No. 77/2022 expeditiously/on priority, fixing dates so as to ensure the parties' presence, with coercive steps against absconding/stalling parties, and a certified copy of the order to be forwarded to the trial court; application thereafter finally disposed of. ¶12

Kashmir Singh Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the High Court should direct that Sessions Trial No. 77/2022 (arising out of case crime no. 130/2021 under Ss. 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 307, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. जरनवेर, district Agra), pending before the District and Sessions Judge, Agra, be concluded expeditiously / on a priority basis.

¶6

Court's answer

The District and Sessions Judge, Agra is directed to ensure that the above-noted trial is concluded on a priority basis, after fixing dates in such a way that the presence of the parties is ensured.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

If the parties do not appear in court despite notice and unnecessarily stall the case, coercive measures (न्यायानुसार कार्रवाई) shall be initiated against them to secure their attendance.

¶11

Key takeaways

The office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the concerned court to ensure compliance.ratio¶13
With the above directions, the application under Section 528 BNSS is finally disposed of.ratio¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J.; Order dated 18.7.2025; Neutral Citation 2025:AHC:117139) — Application under S. 528 BNSS (Appn. No. 25171 of 2025) by Kashmir Singh against State of U.P. seeking time-bound disposal of Sessions Trial No. 77/2022, arising out of case crime no. 130/2021 under Ss. 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 307, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. जरनवेर, district Agra, pending before the District and Sessions Judge, Agra, where only ordinary dates were being fixed. Court directed the trial to be concluded on priority after fixing dates ensuring the parties' presence; if parties remain absent despite notice and stall the case, coercive measures are to be taken to secure their attendance; office directed to transmit a certified copy to the trial court; application finally disposed of.

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117139

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25171 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Kashmir Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Dubey,Shambhu Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

आववेदक ककी ओर सवे धधारधा 528 बब.एन.एस.एस. कवे अन्तररत यह आववेदन पत, ममु०अ०ससं० 130/2021, असंतररत धधारधा 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 307, 504, 506 भधा०दसं०ससं०, थधानधा जरनवेर , जजलधा आररधा सवे उददत सत परबक्षण ससंख्यधा- 77/2022, जजो जनपद एवसं सत न्यधायधाधबश , आररधा कवे न्यधायधालय मम लसंबबत हह, कजो शबघ्रतधा कवे आधधार पर बनस्तधाररत करनवे कधा बनदरश बदयवे जधानवे हवेतमु प्रस्तमुत बकयधा रयधा हह।

¶7

आववेदक कवे बवदधान अजधवकधा एवसं बवदधान अपर शधासककीय अजधवकधा कजो समुनधा तथधा पतधावलब कधा अवलजोकन बकयधा।

¶8

आववेदक कवे बवदधान अजधवकधा कधा अनमुरजोध हह बक उपरजोक वधाद जनपद एवसं सत न्यधायधाधबश, आररधा कवे न्यधायधालय मम लसंबबत हह , बकन्तमु इसकवे कधायरवधाहब मम कवेवल सधामधान्य बतजथयधायाँ बनयत ककी जधा रहब हह एवसं इस वधाद कवे बनस्तधारण मम सममुबचित रुबचि नहहीं लब जधा रहब हह। ऐसब सस्थबत मम प्रकरण कधा शबघ्र बनस्तधारण हजो पधानवे ककी ससंभधावनधा नजर नहहीं आ रहब हह। इसजलए ससंबसंजधत न्यधायधालय कजो उक वधाद कधा बनस्तधारण शबघ्रतधा कवे आधधार पर करनवे कधा बनदरश बदयधा जधाए।

¶9

महनवे आववेदक कवे बवदधान अजधवकधा कवे तकरसं कवे पररप्रवेक्ष्य मम पतधावलब कधा अवलजोकन बकयधा।

¶10

प्रश्नरत प्रकरण कवे उपरजोक तथ्ययों एवसं पररसस्थबतययों कजो दवेखतवे हहए जनपद एवसं सत न्यधायधाधबश , आररधा कजो बनदरबशत बकयधा जधातधा हह बक उपरजोक वधाद कधा

¶11

बनस्तधारण, बदन-प्रबतबदन समुनवधाई करकवे, शबघ्रतधा कवे आधधार पर करनधा समुबनसश्चित बकयधा जधाए। यबद पक्षकधार बनयत बतजथ पर न्यधायधालय मम उपसस्थत नहहीं हजोतवे हह और अनधावश्यक रूप सवे वधाद कजो स्थबरत करधातवे हह तजो उनककी उपसस्थबत समुबनसश्चित करनवे कवे जलए उनकवे बवरुद्ध बनयमधानमुसधार कधायरवधाहब ककी जधाएरब।

¶12

इन बनदरशयों कवे सधाथ धधारधा 528 बब.एन.एस.एस. कवे अन्तररत दधायर यह आववेदन पत असन ् तम र ू प सव े बनस ् तधररत ा बकयधा जधातधा हह।

¶13

कधायधारलय कजो बनदरश बदयधा जधातधा हह बक इस आदवेश ककी एक प्रबतजलबप ससंबसंजधत न्यधायधालय कजो अबवलम्ब भवेजनधा समुबनसश्चित करवे।

¶14

Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Pawan Kumar

¶15

Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kashmir Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kashmir Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases