Disposed¶13

Vimal Kumar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2025NA528/25081/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vimal Kumar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 25081 of 2025; Allahabad High Court; Justice Avnish Saxena; compromise between parties verified vide order dated 17.07.2025; reminder to court concerned for verified compromise; interim order continued; next date 09.01.2026; procedural/interlocutory order; no cases cited; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of the interim order till the next date fixed; matter listed for 09.01.2026 within first ten cases. ¶13

Vimal Kumar vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 25081 of 2025

Vimal Kumar

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 4 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Mukesh Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 81

¶8

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

¶9

Sri Mukesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dilip Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.

¶10

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the parties have entered into compromise, which has already been verified in pursuance of the order dated 17.07.2025.

¶11

Office to issue reminder to the court concerned for sending the verified compromise to the Court.

¶12

List on 09.01.2026, within first ten cases.

¶13

The interim order is continued till the next date fixed.

¶14

(Avnish Saxena,J.)

¶15

November 10, 2025 Shivangi

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vimal Kumar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vimal Kumar v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Narendra Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Uttam Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Baliram @ Balle vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Kishor Apchari ka through Mother vs State of Up and other

Smt. Savara Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 5 Others

Ayodhya Chaurasiya vs State of U.P.