Ramvir Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Ramvir Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Principal prayer for quashing of the chargesheet dated 17.03.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 20.05.2024 was refused; the application was finally disposed of with liberty to the applicant to surrender within four weeks and apply for bail, to be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with Satender Kumar Antil (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825); no coercive action against the applicant for four weeks from the date of the order.

Issue for consideration

Whether the chargesheet dated 17.03.2023 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 20.05.2024 passed in Case No. 34720 of 2024 (State Vs. Ramvir), arising out of Case Crime No. 55 of 2023 under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, ought to be quashed in exercise of the Court's jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS.

Court's answer

On perusal of the entire material on record (impugned order, chargesheet and medical examination report), the Court found this not to be a case requiring its interference, no ground being available in the application on the basis of which the impugned order along with the chargesheet could be set aside.

Ratio / Principle

The prayer sought through the application, i.e., quashing of the chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order, was refused.

Key takeaways

Liberty granted to the applicant to surrender before the court concerned within four weeks and apply for bail; upon such surrender and application, the bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).ratio¶13
Till four weeks from the date of the order, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in pursuance of the aforesaid case.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (Saurabh Srivastava, J.) — Application under Section 528 BNSS (No. 23484 of 2025) seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 17.03.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 20.05.2024 in Case No. 34720 of 2024 (State Vs. Ramvir), arising out of Case Crime No. 55 of 2023 under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Narkhi, District Firozabad, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad: On perusal of the impugned order, chargesheet and medical examination report, the Court found no ground warranting interference and refused the quashing prayer. The application was disposed of with liberty to the applicant to surrender within four weeks and apply for bail, the bail application to be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825); no coercive action was directed to be taken against the applicant for four weeks from the date of the order (October 15, 2025).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 23484 of 2025

Ramvir .	....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gaurav Singh,	Pawan Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 77

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA appearing for the State.

This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 17.03.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 20.05.2024 passed in Case No.34720 of 2024 (State Vs. Ramvir), arising out of Case Crime No.55 of 2023, under Section 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Narkhi, District Firozabad, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad.

On perusal of the entire material available on record in shape of impugned order and chargesheet along with medical examination report, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along chargesheet, can be set aside.

Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.

Lastly, learned counsel for applicant has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.

In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally

NA528 No. 23484 of 2025

2

disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) .

However, it is made clear that till four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.

October 15, 2025 Vivek Kr.

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad