Disposed¶11

Ram Pratap v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Jul 2025NA528/20425/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of criminal proceedings on basis of compromise; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 20425 of 2025; Sections 506, 376B, 323 IPC; case crime no. 79 of 2017; P.S. Atarra, district Banda; compromise dated 15-05-2025; verification of compromise-deed; verification report to High Court; no coercive action; interim protection; Allahabad High Court; Prashant Kumar, J.; order dated 2.7.2025; listed on 31-07-2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection: no coercive action against the applicant in pursuance of Case No. 1990/IX/2024 until the next listing; parties directed to appear before the court below for verification of the compromise in the week commencing 14-07-2025; court below to prepare and send a verification report; matter listed on 31-07-2025. The quashing prayer was not finally decided. ¶11

Ram Pratap vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the entire proceedings of Case No. 1990/IX/2024, arising out of case crime no. 79 of 2017, under Sections 506, 376B, 323 IPC, P.S. Atarra, district Banda, should be quashed on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶6

Court's answer

The parties were directed to file an application along with the compromise-deed before the concerned Court below and appear before it for verification of the compromise in the week commencing 14-07-2025; the Court below is to take steps for verification of the compromise, prepare a verification report and send it to this Court.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

As an interim measure, till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in pursuance of the aforesaid proceedings.

¶11

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Prashant Kumar, J.), order dated 2.7.2025 in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 20425 of 2025 (Ram Pratap v. State of U.P. and Another): application to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 1990/IX/2024, arising out of case crime no. 79 of 2017, under Sections 506, 376B, 323 IPC, P.S. Atarra, district Banda, on the basis of a compromise dated 15-05-2025, which learned counsel for opposite party no.2 did not dispute. The Court did not finally decide the quashing prayer. It directed the parties to file the compromise-deed before the court below and appear for verification of the compromise in the week commencing 14-07-2025, directed the court below to prepare and send a verification report, listed the matter on 31-07-2025, and directed that till then no coercive action be taken against the applicant.

Ram Pratap v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pratap v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malikram Yadav and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Vipin Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Jahir Babu @ Jahir vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Rajesh Kumar Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Ajeet Singh Pal vs State of U.P. and Another

Rafeek vs State of U.P.