Malikram Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1890 of 2025
Appellant :- Malikram Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Appellant :- Anupam Bajpai,Puneet Kumar Srivastava,Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Heard.
Admit.
Notice on behalf of respondent has been accepted by learned Government Advocate, therefore, notice need not be issued.
Summon the lower court record.
Steps to be taken within a week.
C.M.Application No.1 of 2025
Learned AGA prays for and is granted three weeks time to file objection.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Malikram Yadav And Another
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1890/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Avnish Saxena
- Order 2 · Avnish Saxena
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Vipin Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others
Jahir Babu @ Jahir vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others
Jai Prakash Pathak @ Kinni Pathak vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Rajesh Kumar Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.