Disposed¶12

Satendra and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2025NA528/19705/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of chargesheet and cognizance/summoning order refused; S. 528 BNSS application; Case Crime No.276 of 2023; Sections 147, 323, 324, 504 IPC; P.S. Chola, Bulandshahar; Case No.5501 of 2025; protection from coercive action for three weeks; surrender and bail direction; bail to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825); Allahabad High Court; Saurabh Srivastava, J.; decided December 2, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to quash refused; application disposed of with directions that if applicants surrender within three weeks and apply for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI, and that no coercive action be taken against applicants for three weeks. ¶12

Satendra and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the chargesheet dated 31.01.2024, the cognizance/summoning order dated 01.04.2025 and the entire proceedings of Case No.5501 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No.276 of 2023, Sections 147/323/324/504 IPC, P.S. Chola, Bulandshahar) should be quashed.

¶6

Court's answer

On perusal of the FIR narration, the impugned order and the chargesheet, the Court found no ground available in the application on which the impugned order, chargesheet and entire proceedings could be set aside; interference was declined and the prayer refused.

¶7

Ratio / Principle

If the applicants surrender before the court concerned within three weeks and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).

¶12

Key takeaways

Till three weeks from the date of the order, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in pursuance of the aforesaid case.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Saurabh Srivastava, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 19705 of 2025, decided December 2, 2025 — Satendra and 4 others v. State of U.P. and another. Application seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 31.01.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 01.04.2025 in Case No.5501 of 2025 (State v. Satendra and others), arising out of Case Crime No.276 of 2023 under Sections 147, 323, 324, 504 IPC, P.S. Chola, District Bulandshahar, pending before Addl. Civil Judge (S.D.)/Addl. CJM, Court No.4, Bulandshahar, was refused: perusal of the FIR narration, impugned order and chargesheet disclosed no ground for interference. The application was disposed of with directions that if the applicants surrender within three weeks and apply for bail, the bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825); further, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants for three weeks.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 19705 of 2025

¶2

Satendra And 4 Others	.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Abhishek Gupta
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶3

Court No. - 77

¶4

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA appearing for the State.

¶6

This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 31.01.2024 along with cognizance/summoning order dated 01.04.2025 and entire proceeding of Case No.5501 of 2025 (State Vs. Satendra and others), arising out of Case Crime No.276 of 2023, under Sections 147, 323, 324, 504 IPC, P.S. Chola, District Bulandshahar, pending in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.)/Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.4, Bulandshahar.

¶7

On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet and entire proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.

¶8

Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.

¶9

Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.

¶10

NA528 No. 19705 of 2025

¶11

¶12

In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).

¶13

However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case.

¶14

December 2, 2025 Vivek Kr.

¶15

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satendra and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satendra and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Charan Singh Alias Neeru vs State of U.P. and Another

Sonu Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Subhash Chandra and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Kumari Muskan Chawla vs State of Up and Another

Pushpraj Singh @ Pushpendra @ Shilpu vs State of U.P. and Another

Subodh Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another