Application under Section 528 BNSS to quash an Executive Magistrate/Police Commissioner order directing applicants to remove alleged encroachment or appear before the court. The court disposed of it with a direction that objections filed within three weeks be decided in accordance with law within one week after hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1960 of 2025
Chhedi Lal Sahu And 3 Others
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Abhishek Ankur Chaurasia, Santosh Kumar Kesarwani |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 72 |
HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
September 4, 2025 SKD
(Deepak Verma,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 03.12.2024 passed under Section 152(1) BNSS directing removal of alleged encroachment could be quashed, or whether objections should be raised before the concerned authority.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Chhedi Lal Sahu And 3 Others
State of U.P.
Another
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
