Disposed¶4

Om Prakash Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 May 2025NA528/16532/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 16532 of 2025; Om Prakash Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Saurabh Srivastava, J.; order dated 17.5.2025; untraceable record of writ petition granting interim protection in 1991; Chandan Sharma counsel for High Court; Judicial Magistrate Court No.5 Mathura next date 19.05.2025; fresh date 26.05.2025; copy of order via Registrate/Registrar (Compliance) within 24 hours.

What did the court decide?

Interim procedural directions only: matter deferred to be taken up fresh on 26.05.2025; Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Mathura directed to fix its next date after 26.05.2025 (its presently fixed date being 19.05.2025); copy of the order to reach the trial court through Registrar (Compliance) within 24 hours. ¶4

Om Prakash Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶4

Issue for consideration

Traceability of the record of the writ petition said to have granted interim protection way back in 1991, around which the applicant's arguments revolve. +1 more

¶1

Court's answer

A short time was sought and accorded to trace out the facts involved in the matter (the record of the 1991 writ petition being untraceable), with the case to be put up fresh on 26.05.2025.

¶2

Ratio / Principle

Considering the next date of 19.05.2025 fixed before the Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Mathura, that learned court is directed to fix the next date after 26.05.2025.

¶4

Key takeaways

A copy of the order is to be ensured upon the Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Mathura through Registrar (Compliance) within 24 hours, and is also to be provided to Sri Chandan Sharma, learned counsel for High Court, Allahabad.ratio¶5

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Order dated 17.5.2025 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava, J.) in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 16532 of 2025 filed by Om Prakash Pandey against the State of U.P. and another. The record of a writ petition said to have granted interim protection 'way back in the year 1991' was not traceable despite efforts of the applicant's counsel (Aman Sharma); Chandan Sharma, counsel for High Court, Allahabad, appearing at the Court's request, sought time to trace the facts involved. The case was to be put up fresh on 26.05.2025; the Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5, Mathura (whose next date was 19.05.2025) was directed to fix its next date after 26.05.2025; and a copy of the order was to be ensured upon the trial court through Registrar (Compliance) within 24 hours, with another copy to counsel. A purely procedural/scheduling order; no substantive issue adjudicated and no precedent engaged.

Om Prakash Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Pandey v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt Aradhana Yadav and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt Muskan Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Pothiram Alias Chhotu vs State of U.P. and Another

Sanjay Rastogi and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Mahesh Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Sonu Alias Afsar Ali vs State of U.P. and 3 Others