Ram Lal and 10 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Brij Raj Singh J., 15 Oct 2025; APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1544 of 2025; dismissed; quashing of s.173(4) BNSS order dated 08.04.2025 (Misc. Case No.363/2024, Ramdev v. Ramlal, ACJM-III Ayodhya) and Sessions Judge Ayodhya rejection order dated 11.08.2025 (Criminal Revision No.NIL/2025) refused; FIR No.0508/2025 dated 11.10.2025 (ss.191(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 309(6) BNS) lodged in compliance; remedy lies in challenging FIR, not the impugned order; applicants: Ram Lal and 10 Others (counsel Amrendra Singh, Pawan Kumar Dubey); opposite parties: State of U.P. (G.A.).
What did the court decide?
Since an FIR has been lodged in compliance of the order passed by the court below (order dated 8.4.2025), the applicants' remedy is to challenge the FIR before the appropriate Court or take any other legal recourse as per law; the impugned order cannot be questioned at this juncture.