Disposed

Harendra Jaat v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC14 Apr 2025NA528/12224/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application to quash criminal proceedings under the Arms Act; counsel relinquished the quashing prayer seeking bail instead. Court directed that if the applicant appears and moves bail within one month, it be considered per Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines; no coercive action for one month.

What did the court decide?

Applicant may appear within one month and move bail to be considered per Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines; no coercive action for one month.

Harendra Jaat Vs State of U.P. and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:55226

¶2

Court No. - 74

¶3

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 12224 of 2025

¶4

Applicant :- Harendra Jaat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Mani Tripathi,Som Veer Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This application has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire criminal proceeding in pursuance of charge sheet dated 12.06.2015 as well as cognizance order dated 28.07.2015 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Mathura against the applicants in Criminal Case no. 1064/IX/2015 (State vs. Harendra Jaat) arising out of Case Crime no. 337 of 2015 under Section 3/25 Arms Act, PS- Raya, District Mathura, pending before learned Judicial Magistrate-XII, Mathura.

¶8

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he relinquishes the prayer for quashment and wishes to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773.

¶9

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer so made.

¶10

Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the court concerned within one month from today and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil (supra).

¶11

For a period of one month from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

¶12

It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved

¶13

within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicant.

¶14

With the above direction, the instant application under Section 528 BNSS stands disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 15.4.2025 Shaswat

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Harendra Jaat v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harendra Jaat v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases