Lucknow Development Authority, Naveen Bhawan Vipin Khand, Gomti Nagar Lko. Thru. Secy. v. Jagdish Prasad and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for want of prosecution; appellant failed to deposit deficit court fee despite time granted on 12.05.2025 and listings on 13.08.2025 and 14.10.2025. Case: FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 110 of 2025, Lucknow Development Authority v. Jagdish Prasad And Another, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow), Court No. - 19, decided November 25, 2025 by Prashant Kumar, J. Counsel: Rajnish Kumar Singh and Mukund Tewari (appellant); Amardeep Yadav (respondent nos. 1 and 2). No statutes or precedent cases are cited in this judgment; no monetary figure for the deficit court fee is stated.
What did the court decide?
The instant first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution because, despite the two months' time granted on 12.05.2025 to deposit the deficit court fee and subsequent listings on 13.08.2025 and 14.10.2025, the appellant did not remove the defect of deficient court fee.