The appellant challenged an order rejecting an application to substitute a deceased plaintiff based on a Will deed found after 31 years. The Court dismissed the appeal, holding the application barred by limitation due to unexplained delay and noting serious doubts regarding the Will's genuineness.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42741
Court No. - 2
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 345 of 2025 Appellant :- Prahlad Singh Respondent :- Shri Ram Singh (Deceased) And 38 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Bachchu Lal Yadav
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
executed in his favour coupled with the fact that legal heirs of Ram Singh, who have been substituted in the present proceeding, have denied any such Will. Therefore, this create serious doubt about the genuineness of Will.
Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Arvind
Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for substitution was barred by limitation due to a 31-year unexplained delay in producing the Will deed?
Whether the Will deed was genuinely executed or forged based on expert opinion?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ajay Kumar Parmar Vs. State of RajasthanReferred¶6
Ajay Kumar Parmar Vs. State of Rajasthan; 2012 0 Supreme (SC) 668
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Prahlad Singh
Shri Ram Singh (Deceased) And 38 Others
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
