First appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as appellant could not be contacted and counsel had no instructions; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1158 of 2013
Appellant :- Parshuram Pandey Respondent :- Smt. Rita Srivastava And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- M.N.Iqbal,Dr. Deepti Tripathi,Randheer Singh Malik,S.A.A.Rizvi Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Mishra,Anjani Nath Khare,Chandresh Mani Shukla,Dinesh Kumar,Ramakar Shukla
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Dr.Deepti Tripathi, learned counsel for the appellant submits that she has no instructions in the matter and despite efforts made by her the appellant could not be contacted, whereas Shri Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
. ...................................... .(Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Banswar
Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parshuram Pandey
Smt. Rita Srivastava
Ors.
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
