First appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant was unrepresented and made no request for adjournment; any interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 143 of 2012
Appellant :- Sushil Kumar Respondent :- Additional District Judge Barabanki And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Ajai Kumar Singh,Surendra Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,D.S. Tiwari
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
None is present for the appellant to press this application nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sushil Kumar
Additional District Judge Barabanki
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
