Revision filed by the revisionist was not pressed as counsel stated the parties had settled their disputes and were residing together peacefully. The High Court dismissed the revision as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw; revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 943 of 2024
Ajay Gupta
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : R.B. Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 89
HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.
(Madan Pal Singh,J.)
November 13, 2025
pks
Digitally signed by :- PANKAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ajay Gupta
State of U.P.
Madan Pal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
