Disposed¶13

Devendra v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Sept 2025CRLRD/755/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal revision defective; delay condonation application; 523 days delay; Stamp Reporter report; withdrawal by revisionist's counsel; dismissed as withdrawn; revision consigned to record; no orders on merits; Allahabad High Court; Court No. 93; Harvir Singh, J.; decided September 17, 2025; counsel Shiv Kumar Singh for revisionist; G.A./AGA for the State.

What did the court decide?

None. The delay condonation application was dismissed as withdrawn and the criminal revision was consigned to record without adjudication on merits. ¶13

Devendra Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 755 of 2024

¶2

Devendra

¶3

.....Revisionist(s)

¶4

Versus
State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Shiv Kumar Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No.- 93

¶5

HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

¶6

Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 01 Of 2024.

¶7

List has been revised. Learned counsel for the revisionist is present. Learned AGA for the State is also present.

¶8

Besides the present revision, the delay condonation application has also been filed by the revisionist seeking condonation of delay in filing the instant criminal revision.

¶9