Nanhe v. State of Up and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 308 of 2024
Revisionist :- Nanhe Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
- Case called out.
- Shri Niyaz Ahmad holding brief for Shri Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA are present.
- Shri Niyaz Ahmad, Advocate prays for adjournment of the case today on the ground that learned counsel for the revisionist is busy elsewhere.
- It is a bad practice that even in petty matters like delay condonation application adjournment is being sought by the learned counsel for the revisionist.
- List this case on 31.10.2025 in the additional cause list.
Order Date :- 22.8.2025 safi
Parties & counsel
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLRD/308/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rajeev Misra
- Order 2 · Rajeev Misra
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court