Dismissed
Mohd. Inam v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCCRLRD/1064/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Criminal revision filed by the revisionist was not pressed; counsel sought withdrawal, and the High Court dismissed the revision as withdrawn and consigned it to records.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1064 of 2024
¶2
Mohd. Inam
¶3
.....Revisionist(s)
¶4
Versus
¶5
State of U.P.
¶6
| .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : Ankit Srivastava, Ch. Dil Nisar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 93 |
¶7
HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.
¶8
- Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
¶9
- At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he does not want to press this revision and seeks to withdraw the revision.
¶10
- In view of the aforesaid statement, this instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
¶11
- This revision is consigned to records.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mohd. Inam
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Harvir Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLRD/1064/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court