Criminal revision challenging a Chief Judicial Magistrate's order directing that complainant's witnesses and case documents be supplied to the accused under Section 173(4) BNSS. The High Court noted there was no injury report on record and found no illegality in the order, dismissing the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3883
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 79 of 2025
Revisionist :- Amit Kumar Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 6 Others
Counsel for Revisionist :- Vimal Kishor Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent Nos.2 to 7 are dispensed with.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 11.11.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No.2851/2024 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.18, Barabanki.
The order dated 11.11.2024 is extracted below:-
" पततवललपपशहहई।आवपदककपववदतनअधधवकतककससनतगयतएववपततवलल कतपररशललनवकयत। यहपतररनत - पतआवपदकअवमतकसमतरपटपलदतरतववपकलगण 1. चनदशपखर , 2. मसकपशकसमतर , 3. अजय , 4. वशवककलतश , 5. आवदतयकसमतरव 6. अतसल कसमतरवनवतसलगणगतमकसमहरररत , रतनतककतवतललनगरबतरतबवकककपववरद पसतसतपकरणममअवभयकगपवजलककतकरतकरवववपचनतकरतयपजतनपकपआशय सपपसतसतवकयतगयतहक। पतररनत - पतममववणरतकरनसवक ममइसपकतरहकवकपतररकतकरनहकवक पतररवदनतवक 06. 09.2024 ककसमयकरलब 09:00 बजपससबहअपनपपडकसल वशवमकपअहततपममगपटबनदकरकपसनतनकररहतरतवकइतनपममपतररकपहल गत कपपसरतनलरवधजशकपआधतरपरववपकलसव 0-1 तत 6 नपअपनपहतरकमम लतठल , सररयतलपकरबनदगपटखकलकरअहततपममघ आयपऔरपतररकक भदल - भदलगतधलयतवदपनपलगपपतररदतरतगतधलयतवदपनपसपजबमनतवकयतवक इतनपममसभललकगएकरतयहककरपतररककमतरनपकपधलएदरडपपतररअपनल जतनबचतनपकपधलएअहततपममबनतकमरतममजतनबचतनपकपधलएघ गयत औरदरवतजतबनदकरहलरहतरत।ववपकलजनदरवतजपममधककतदपकरघ आयपऔरपतररककलतत - घघततवसररयतसपमतरनपलगप।धजससपपतररकप शरलरममकतफकचकटपआयलपतररकतशकरससनकरगत कपतमतमलकगइकडत हकगयपऔरउकलकगतकपललकतरततबअजयनपहतरममधलयपकटपसपपतरर ककजतनसपमतरडतलनपककवनयतसपकटपसपफतयरकरवदयत।पतररदतरत
पसधलससपवशकतयतकरनपपरककईकतयरवतहलनहहहकनपकतकरनवकयतगयत हक।
पतररनत - पतममववणरततथयतसपसपषहहवकआवपदकककववपकलगणकपनतमव पततजततहकतरतगवतहभलजततहक।इसपकतरआवपदकदतरतधजनतथयतकक ववणरतवकयतगयतहकवपसभलतथयपघणररपसपसवयवककजतनकतरलममरखतत हक।वहअपनतमतमलतअपनपसतकयसपसतवबतकरसकततहक। उपरकककप समबनधमम , मतननलयउबतमनयतयतलयवमतननलयउचच नयतयतलयककववधधवयवतयतससखवततसलबनतमउतरपदपशरतजय ए०सल०सल० 2007 (6) ए०एल०जप०पपज 424, फतदररतमतबनतम उ०प०रतजय 2011 (72) ए०सल०सल० 564 पघणरपलठ , ककषणकसनतरबनतम उतरपदपशरतजय 2018 (1) ए०एल०जप० 649, एववमतननलचउब नयतयतलयककववधधवयवतयतनतएववअनयबनतमउतरपदपशरतजय (2021) 2 ए०सल०सल० 670 ससपलनककटरयहतहततदरअनसपयकजयहक।धजतमममतननलय उचचतननयतयतलयवमतननलयउबनयतयतलयनपयहअवभवनधत र रतवकयत गयतहकवकपतररनत - पत 173 (4) बल०एन०एस०एस०मपपतयपकदशतममपरम सघचनतररपकटरपवजलककतकरतनतमधजसट ट कपधलएबतधयकतरलनहहहकतरत यसवकयसकदशतओवममसवजपयअपरतधककससरवतहकतपहहएभलपकरणपररवतद कपरपममदजरवकयतजतसकततहक। उपरककतथयवपररससरवतयतकपआलककममइसनयतयतलयकपमतमम आवपदक दतरत पसतसत पतररनत पत अनतगरत धतरत 173 (4) बल०एन०एस०एस०पररवतदकपरपममदजरवकएजतनपयकगयहह। आदपश
पतररनत - पत - 173 (4) बल०एन०एस०एस०पररवतदकपरपममदजरहक।वतसतप बयतनअनतगरतधतरत - 223 बल०एन०एस०एस०वदनतवक 23.12.2024 कक पपशहक।पततवललववधधन स तरवनसततरणहपतससमबसनधतकपततधधकतरकप नयतयतलयककअनतररतककजततलहक। "
A perusal of the record shows that there is no injury report in this case. Learned counsel for the revisionist has also fairly admitted that there is no injury report on the record and therefore, there appears to be no illegality in the order impugned as the complainant is fully aware about the witnesses and their addresses so he can prove his case by the evidence, there is nothing wrong with the impugned order. The revision is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed .
Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Saurabh Yadav/-
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the CJM's direction to supply documents under Section 173(4) BNSS with copies of statements under Section 223 BNSS was erroneous absent an injury report?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Kumar Patel
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
