Criminal revision filed against the order of the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate, Garhmukteshwar, who took cognizance of offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The High Court admitted the revision and issued notice to the opposite parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 7717 of 2025
Sunil Kumar
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
| .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : Ramesh Kumar Prajapati |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 91
HON'BLE LAKSHMI KANT SHUKLA, J.
(Lakshmi Kant Shukla,J.)
December 5, 2025 Brijesh Maurya
Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned Magistrate correctly took cognizance of the offence rejecting the revisionist's objection?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Kumar
State Of U.P.
Lakshmi Kant Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
