Criminal revision challenging the trial court's order rejecting the revisionists' discharge application in a complaint case under sections 354-B, 323, 504, 506 IPC. The High Court found prima facie evidence on record, held alibi is a matter for trial, and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 6542 of 2025
Shiv Kumar And Another
.....Revisionist(s)
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : | Chandra Bhushan Prasad |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | G.A. |
| Court No.- 91 |
HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
CRLR No. 6542 of 2025
2
Shiv Kumar torn her cloth and fixed cloth in her mouth. The statement of another witness-Virendra @ Boby as C.W-1 had also been recorded who had supported the version of victim/complainant. The trial court had perused and examined all the material evidence on the record and thereafter rejected the application for discharge of the revisionists.
October 27, 2025 M. Tarik
(Abdul Shahid,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHD TARIK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court rightly rejected the revisionists' discharge application and the criminal proceedings should be quashed.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
State of U.P.
Second Opposite Party
Abdul Shahid
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
