Sandeep Kumar Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Revision 5172 of 2025 (also styled CRLR No. 5172 of 2025), High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 86, Judge Nalin Kumar Srivastava, decided 15-09-2025; Section 311 Cr.P.C. rejection upheld; summoning of Public Information Officer, Pindra refused as land possession an admitted fact; land dispute/revenue case between parties; murder trial Sessions Trial No. 61 of 2017, case crime no. 514 of 2016, Sections 147/148/149/302/323/325 IPC, P.S. Shivpur, District Varanasi; Additional District Judge Fast Track Court-II (crime against women); revision dismissed in limine at admission stage; revisionist Sandeep Kumar Jaiswal; no precedent cases cited.
What did the court decide?
Since possession of the present informant/revisionist over the land in dispute was an admitted fact (a revenue case being pending between the parties), the trial court found no necessity to take the papers in question on record or to summon the Public Information Officer as witness to prove those papers.