Rahul Singh Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad accepted notice on the State's behalf and directed issuance of notice to the second opposite party for filing a counter-affidavit in Criminal Revision No. 432 of 2025.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 432 of 2025
Rahul Singh Yadav
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Abhishek Mishra, Binod Kumar Jha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 90
HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.
- Learned AGA for the State has accepted notice on behalf of the State. He prays for and is granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit.
- Issue notice to the opposite party no. 2 returnable within four weeks, who may also file counter affidavit within the same period. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within a week thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul Singh Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/432/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Madan Pal Singh
- Order 2 · Madan Pal Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court