Smt Pushpa v. State of Up Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal revision where no counsel appeared for the revisionist; the High Court adjourned the matter in the interest of justice, listing it for review after three weeks. No substantive issue was decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 347 of 2024
Smt Pushpa
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus State Of Up Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ram Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J.
- List revised.
- None is present on behalf of the revisionist. Learned AGA for the State is present.
- In the interest of justice, case is adjourned.
- List after three weeks.
(Divesh Chandra Samant,J.)
November 3, 2025
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt Pushpa
- respondent
State of UP Others
Coram
Divesh Chandra Samant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/347/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court