Pappu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 11; CRIMINAL REVISION No. 269 of 2025; revisionist Pappu; opposite party State of U.P. (Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow) and 2 others; counsel: Ramesh Kumar Srivastava for revisionist; G.A. and Dilip Kumar Pandey for opposite party; judge Rajnish Kumar; order dated 30.5.2025; mediation ongoing per Mediation Centre report; no personal appearance; office mis-listed as personal appearance case; relisted 4th week of July 2025; interim order continues till next listing. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no holdings, no quantum.
What did the court decide?
Administrative deferral only: matter listed in the 4th week of July, 2025, and any interim order is to continue till the next date of listing. No substantive relief adjudicated. ¶¶10