Dismissed¶12

Jitendra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC14 Sept 2025CRLR/2455/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Criminal Revision No. 2455 of 2024, Jitendra Singh v. State of U.P. and Another; decided 15 September 2025 by Madan Pal Singh, J. Sole revisionist died during pendency; revision dismissed as infructuous on counsel's report, undisputed by learned AGA. Counsel: Abhinav Gaur (with Ankit Tiwari holding brief) for revisionist; G.A. for opposite parties. No statute or precedent cited; no quantum involved; disposition: dismissed, no relief granted.

What did the court decide?

The instant revision is dismissed as infructuous, following the report by counsel for the revisionist that the sole revisionist had died during its pendency, a fact undisputed by the learned AGA. ¶12

Jitendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2455 of 2024

Jitendra Singh

.....Revisionist(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

¶7

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s)	: Abhinav Gaur
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 91

¶9

HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.

¶10

Shri Ankit Tiwari, holding brief of Shri Abhinav Gaur, learned counsel for the revisionist states that during the pendency of the instant revision, the sole revisionist died, hence the instant revision has become infructuous.

¶11