Hanuman Agrawal v. State of Up and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision listed for revision after counsel appearance; no substantive adjudication.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2285 of 2024
Hanuman Agrawal
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus State Of Up And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mohammad Vasil Siddiqui, Mustaqeem Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 93
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
List has been revised. Learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the State are present. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the revisionist, although Mr. Manish Khare, Advocate has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2.
List on 17.11.2025, showing the name of Mr. Manish Khare, Advocate as counsel for opposite party no.2 before the appropriate Court.
The matter shall not be treated as tied up or part heard to this Bench.
November 6, 2025
Abhishek Singh
Parties & counsel
- respondent
State of UP
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
Coram
Tarun Saxena
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/2285/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court