On considering the facts and circumstances, submissions made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. and perusal of record, the order passed by the learned trial court, it appears that due to neglect on the part of revisionist the opposite party no. 2 is living apart from him with her minor child. She has no any source of income to maintain herself and her son. The marriage was performed in the year 2017 and she is living in her Maika from the year 2022. Since then the revisionist has not provided any money either to the wife or to the minor child for their maintenance. It also appears that when the revisionist was working at Gurgaon the opposite party no. 2 was also living there with him but due to misbehavior on his part she started living in her Maika. The revisionist has stated that the opposite party no. 2 has completed BTC and also knows the work of sewing and embroidery and also runs a beauty parlor and earns Rs. 30,000/- - 35,000/- per month but there is nothing on record to support the statement of the revisionist in relation to the income of the wife. The child is studying in Saraswati Shishu Mandir Baldev and Rs. 1,700/- per month are incurred as his monthly fees. The receipt of which has also been filed on record. In this way Rs. 5,000/- per month for maintenance of wife and Rs. 3,000/- per month for maintenance of child can not be said to be excessive or more than sufficient. Since the revisionist has already worked as software engineer and is also able bodied person, therefore he can not back himself from his legal obligation to maintain his wife and minor child. There appears no illegality or impropriety in the order passed by the learned Trial Court and also in fixing the amount of
