Dashrath Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal in default (non-prosecution). Dashrath Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and others, CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4402 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 30, decided November 15, 2025, coram Rajiv Gupta, J. and Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J. Counsel listed for petitioner: Farooq Ayoob, Km. Pooja Tiwari; G.A. for respondents. On the date of hearing nobody appeared for the petitioner and no adjournment was sought; the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution. No statute, precedent, impugned order, issue or quantum is discussed; the decision carries no ruling on the merits and is citable, if at all, only as an instance of dismissal for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution because no one appeared for the petitioner when the case was called out in the revised list, no request for adjournment or pass over was made, while learned AGA was present for the respondent-State.