Petitioner not named in an FIR under BNS 2023 sections sought protection from coercive action via writ petition. Relying on Hukum Chand Garg (SLP(Crl) 762/2020), the bench held such petitions by non-named persons not maintainable and dismissed the writ.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:27116-DB
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3864 of 2025
Petitioner :- Rahul Saini Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Nisha
Digitally signed by :- nisha kumari High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking no coercive action against a person not named in the FIR is maintainable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hukum Chand Garg and others vs. State of U.P. and othersRelied on¶4
S.L.P (Criminal) No. 762 of 2020 (Hukum Chand Garg and others vs. State of U.P. and others)
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Saini
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Birla
Nand Prabha Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
