Criminal writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared in revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 368 of 2025
Dilip Kumar Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amar Nath Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Nadim
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dilip Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others
Rajiv Gupta
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
