Dismissed¶15

Sandhya Bajpai and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC3 Dec 2025CRLP/3139/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

FIR quashing writ petition dismissed as not pressed; B.N.S. 2023 Sections 61(2) 221 305(e) 308(5) 356(2); F.I.R. No.147 of 2025 dated 06.04.2025 Police Station Gomti Nagar District Lucknow; charge sheet dated 23.07.2025 filed before supervisory authority against Amol Bajpai Rahul Rajpoot Aman Sharma; names of Sandhya Bajpai Apurva Bajpai Ram Kumar Bajpai dropped; liberty to pursue other remedies; interim order vacated; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench Court No. 11 Abdul Moin Babita Rani; December 3, 2025; CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 3139 of 2025; Sandhya Bajpai v State of U.P.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioners to pursue other remedies as may be available to them; interim order, if any, vacated. ¶15

Sandhya Bajpai and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru.Prin… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioners to pursue other remedies as may be available to them; interim order, if any, vacated.

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petition praying for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 06.04.2025, registered as F.I.R. No.147 of 2025 under Sections 61(2), 221, 305(e), 308(5), 356(2) of B.N.S., 2023 at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow, could be pressed to a substantive ruling. +1 more

¶12

Ratio / Principle

Upon the disclosure that the charge sheet dated 23.07.2025 had been filed against Amol Bajpai (petitioner no.3), Rahul Rajpoot and Aman Sharma, while the names of petitioners no.1, 2 and 4 had been dropped, learned counsel for the petitioners did not intend to press on with the writ petition and prayed for its dismissal as not pressed with liberty to pursue other remedies as may be available to them.

¶14

Key takeaways

The Court acceded to counsel's prayer and dismissed the present petition as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.ratio¶15
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.ratio¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 11 — Hon'ble Abdul Moin, J. and Hon'ble Mrs. Babita Rani, J. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 3139 of 2025, decided December 3, 2025. Petitioners Sandhya Bajpai, Apurva Bajpai, Amol Bajpai and Ram Kumar Bajpai v. State Of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. and 3 others; counsel Ripu Daman Shahi and Apoorv Srivastava for petitioners, G.A. and Anurag.S.Kaalesh for respondents. The petition prayed quashing of F.I.R. dated 06.04.2025 registered as F.I.R. No.147 of 2025 under Sections 61(2), 221, 305(e), 308(5), 356(2) of B.N.S., 2023 at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. At the hearing the learned A.G.A. disclosed (on instructions sent by Sri Zaseem Raza, Sub-Inspector, P.S. Gomti Nagar) that a charge sheet dated 23.07.2025 had been filed before the supervisory authority against Amol Bajpai (petitioner no.3), Rahul Rajpoot and Aman Sharma, whereas the names of petitioners no.1, 2 and 4 (Sandhya Bajpai, Apurva Bajpai, Ram Kumar Bajpai) had been dropped. Counsel for the petitioners thereupon declined to press the writ petition and prayed for dismissal as not pressed with liberty to pursue other remedies as may be available. The Court dismissed the petition as not pressed with that liberty and vacated the interim order, if any. No substantive ruling was rendered on the merits of quashing the F.I.R.; no precedent was cited or engaged; filing date is not stated in the text.

Sandhya Bajpai and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandhya Bajpai and 3 Others v. State of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sumitra and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others

Sharma Devi and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Others

Narendra and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Sandhya Bajpai and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Nandkishor and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Rahul vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others