Parashuram @ Parashuram Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 2817 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench (Court No. 30), decided 24 November 2025; Coram: Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta, J. and Hon'ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.; Petitioner: Parashuram @ Parashuram Yadav (Counsel: Jagdish Pratap Pandey, Anoop Kumar Misra); Respondents: State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and others (Counsel: G.A.). Subject: writ petition disposed of because investigation had concluded, thrice final report submitted, and petitioner's protest petition pending before competent Magistrate; liberty left to petitioner to approach the competent Magistrate for redressal. No statutes or case law cited; no quantum involved; digitally signed by Kalim Uddin Siddiqui.
What did the court decide?
In view of the concluded investigation, the thrice-submitted final report and the pending protest petition, at this stage the prayer sought in the writ petition cannot be granted, leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the competent Magistrate for necessary redressal.