Petitioner filed writ petition challenging final report in pending case; High Court refused interim relief pending magistrate consideration on protest petition; disposed of writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2817 of 2024
Parashuram @ Parashuram Yadav
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jagdish Pratap Pandey, Anoop Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
November 24, 2025 KU
Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parashuram @ Parashuram Yadav
State Of U.P.
RAJIV GUPTA
PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
