Chandra Vijay Yadav @ C.V. Azad v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural-dismissal entry only. Keywords: dismissal for non-prosecution; writ petition unpressed by petitioner's counsel; revised call; learned AGA present for State; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 2745 of 2024; Chandra Vijay Yadav @ C.V. Azad; State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Court No. 30; Rajiv Gupta, J.; Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.; dated November 18, 2025. Contains no ratio, statutory reference, or precedent treatment; cite only if an example of non-prosecution dismissal is needed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution because no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press it even in the revised call, while learned AGA for the State was present. ¶13