Petitioners, not named in the FIR but subject to NBW, sought quashing of the FIR and protection from arrest. The Court held that since petitioners were not originally named in the FIR and the case arose during investigation, no case was made out for quashing the FIR. The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:10111-DB
Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 261 of 2025
Petitioner :- Shyamakanat Shukla And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamendra Singh,Vidya Kant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Shashi Bhushan Mishra,G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 21.1.2025 S.P.
Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners, not being named in the FIR, maintain a petition for quashing of the FIR?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shyamakanat Shukla
Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
