Writ petition challenging an FIR under the Gangsters Act; State informed that a charge sheet had been filed in court. The petition was dismissed as infructuous and any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2435 of 2024
Abrar
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Others |
Home Lko. And .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Sanjay Kumar, Pramod Kumar Shukla |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
(Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)
October 28, 2025 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the FIR remains maintainable after a charge sheet has been filed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abrar
State of U.P.
Rajnish Kumar
Zafeer Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
