A writ petition seeking intervention in an ongoing investigation was dismissed as infructuous after the AGA pointed out that investigation was concluded and a charge sheet had been submitted against the petitioner, who did not dispute this; liberty was given to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 191 of 2024
Rohit Agarwal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pranjal Krishna Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.)
November 20, 2025 R
Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rohit Agarwal
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Rajiv Gupta
Pramod Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
