Hirawati Devi and 4 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Refusal to interfere with FIR via writ jurisdiction. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 10163 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, decided 10.11.2025 (Rajnish Kumar and Zafeer Ahmad, JJ.). Petitioners Hirawati Devi and 4 others sought relief against F.I.R. dated 23.09.2025, Case Crime No. 198 of 2025, sections 69, 319, 115(2), 108, 352, 351(2), 76, 127(2), 64 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P.Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Pratapgarh; alleged false implication; main accused Sujeet Kumar Yadav stated to be on district-court bail (counsel's submission). Court: commissioning of offence cannot be ruled out; petitioners' defence cannot be considered, relying on Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and Muskan v. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya); petition dismissed. Search terms: quashing of FIR refused, writ petition criminal, BNS sections 69/319/115(2)/108/352/351(2)/76/127(2)/64, D.P.Act 3/4, Pratapgarh, Neeharika framework.