Junaid and Another Vs State of Up and Another

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:140885

Court No. - 83

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 808 of 2024

Appellant :- Junaid And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Sanjay Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The parties before this Court had made a request that they have entered into a compromise in this matter and have settled all the disputes between them and now they do not want to proceed with this matter. It is further submitted that in compliance of the order of this Court dated 15.07.2024, the compromise has been verified by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge/ Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Amroha vide order dated 30.07.2024. Further record discloses that verification report dated 28.03.2024 has also been received on record.

¶8

This criminal appeal under Section 14-A(1) SC/ST Act has been filed for quashing of charge-sheet dated 10.10.2023 as well as entire proceedings of S.T. No.1188 of 2023 (State v. Junaid & ors) arising out of Case Crime No.279 of 2023, under Sections 323 & 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) SC/ST Act, Police Station- Saidnagi, District- Amroha, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Amroha.

¶9

Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted before this Court that the compromise entered into between the parties has been made without any coercion or undue influence upon the informant of this case and is a result of free will and consent of the parties.

¶10

Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 states that opposite party no.2 has not received any penny towards compensation.

¶11

6 It appears from perusal of the record that the present case is having a nature of purely private dispute and prima facie it also appears that the alleged offence has not been committed on

¶12

account of the caste of the victim and except some offence under SC/ST Act, minor offences have been levelled against the accused. Further, the compromise between the parties is the result of free will and consent of the informant-opposite party no. 2 without any undue influence.

¶13

Whether a compromise can be verified and accepted in a case relating to an offence under SC/ST Act has been answered in Ramawatar Vs. State of M.P. (2022) 13 SCC 635 . Paragraph no. 17 of the said judgment is quoted herein below:-

¶14

"17. On the other hand, where it appears to the Court that the offence in question, although covered under the SC/ST Act, is primarily private or civil in nature, or where the alleged offence has not been committed on account of the caste of the victim, or where the continuation of the legal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, the Court can exercise its powers to quash the proceedings. On similar lines, when considering a prayer for quashing on the basis of a compromise/settlement, if the Court is satisfied that the underlying objective of the Act would not be contravened or diminished even if the felony in question goes unpunished, the mere fact that the offence is covered under a "special statute" would not refrain this Court or the High Court, from exercising their respective powers under Article 142 of the Constitution or Section 482 Cr.P.C."

¶15

It is further held in paragraph no. 19 of the said judgment which is quoted herein under:-

¶16

"19. We may hasten to add that in cases such as the present, the Courts ought to be even more vigilant to ensure that the complainant-victim has entered into the compromise on the volition of his/her free will and not on account of any duress. It cannot be understated that since members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe belong to the weaker sections of our country, they are more prone to acts of coercion, and therefore ought to be accorded a higher level of protection. If the Courts find even a hint of compulsion or force, no relief can be given to the accused party. What factors the Courts should consider, would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case"

¶17

A perusal of the full Bench judgment in Ghulam Rasool Khan And Others vs State Of U.P And Another 2022 (8) ADJ 691 reveals that a matter under the SC/ST Act may be compounded in a criminal appeal under section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act and there is no need to take recourse of U/s. 482 Cr.P.C. for the same.

¶18

In view of that, this Court finds that since the parties have entered into compromise which has already been verified by the trial court.

¶19

Hence, the proceedings emanating from the charge-sheet dated 10.10.2023 as well as entire proceedings of S.T. No.1188

¶20

of 2023 (State v. Junaid & ors) arising out of Case Crime No.279 of 2023, under Sections 323 & 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(da) and 3(1)(dha) SC/ST Act, Police Station- Saidnagi, District- Amroha, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Amroha is hereby quashed and the present criminal appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise entered into by both the parties.

¶21

Order Date :- 14.8.2025 SY

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SWETA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Junaid and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Junaid and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases