Ram Kishan Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal appeal listed for directions; the court summoned records from the court below, directed the District Judge, Balrampur to ensure production by next listing, and noted the State's objection. No substantive adjudication.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2246 of 2025
Ram Kishan Yadav
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s) : Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 15
HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
Let the records of court below be summoned.
District Judge, Balrampur to ensure that the records are produced by the next date of listing.
Objection filed on behalf of the State is taken in the record.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ram Kishan Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2246/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
- Order 2 — this page · Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court