Dismissed

Guddu Diwakar v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2025CRLA/10585/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRLA No. 10585 of 2024, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J., decided October 13, 2025. Guddu Diwakar (appellant/complainant) v. State of U.P. and 8 others. Appeal under Section 14-A(1) SC/ST Act against rejection of complaint under Section 203 CrPC; Complaint Case No. 190 of 2022; Sections 147, 504, 506, 427, 379 IPC; Section 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act; P.S. Kotwali Fatehgarh, Di

What the court decided

AI extract

Guddu Diwakar vs State of U.P. and 8 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 10585 of 2024

Guddu Diwakar

…..Appellant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and 8 others

¶7

…..Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Arjit Srivastava, Usha Srivastava, Vinod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 86

¶9

HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J.

¶10

1&;g vihy] vUrxZr /kkjk 14&, ¼1½ ,l0 lh0@,l0 Vh0 ,DV ] vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ls bl vk’k; ls ;ksftr dh x;h gS fd ifjokn la[;k 190 o"kZ 2022] ¼xqMMw fnokdj izfr mek’kadj ,oa vU;½] vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 504] 506] 427] 379 Hkk0 na0 la0] ,oa /kkjk 3 ¼1½ (X) ,l0 lh0@,l0 Vh0 ,DV] Fkkuk dksrokyh Qrsgx<] ftyk Q:Z[kkckn esa fo}ku fo’ks"k U;k;k/kh’k ,l- lh-@,l- Vh- ,DV@ f}rh; vij ftyk ,oa l= U;k;k/kh’k Q:Z[kkckn }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 4&7&2023 dks fujLr fd;k tk, ftlds }kjk vihykFkhZ dk ifjokn /kkjk 203 na0 iz0 la0 ds rgr fujLr fd;k x;k gSA

¶11

2&vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDRkk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDRkk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶12

¶13

CRLA No. - 10585 of 2024

¶14

3&vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDRkk }kjk dFku fd;k x;k fd fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k fof/k laxr ugha gSA iz’uxr ekeys esa vihykFkhZ ,oa xokgksa dk c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 200 ,oa 202 na0 iz0 la0 esa vafdr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa iz’uxr ?kVuk dk o.kZu fd;k x;k gS ijUrq blds ckotwn Hkh fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZ dk ifjokn fujLr dj fn;k x;k gS tks fof/k laxr ugha gSA ,slh n’kk esa fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶15

4&blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDRkk }kjk dFku fd;k x;k fd izkjEHk esa iz’uxr ekeys ds lEca/k esa izkFkfedh ntZ djk;h x;h Fkh ftlesa foospuk dk dksbZ rF; ugha ik;k x;k vkSj vafre vk[;k U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr dh x;hA ifjoknh ,oa xokgksa dk c;ku vUrxZr /kkjk 200 ,oa 202 na0 iz0 la0 esa ntZ fd;k x;k gS ftlls Li"V gksrk gS fd iz’uxr ekeyk iw.kZ :i ls nhokuh izd`fr dk gSA iz’uxr ekeys esa fdlh dks dksbZ pksV ugha vk;h gSA izFke }"V;k iz’uxr ekeys esa foi{khx.k ds fo:} ,l-lh-@,l-Vh- ,DV dk dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gSA fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k esa dksbZ fof/kd =qfV vFkok vfu;ferrk ugha ik;h tkrh gSA ,slh n’kk esa ;g vihy fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶16

5&i=koyh ds voyksdu ls fofnr gksrk gS fd iz’uxr izdj.k esa iqfyl }kjk rhu&rhu ckj foospuk djus ds i’pkr tkap esa ekeyk lgh ugha ik;k x;k vkSj /kkjk 200 ,oa 202 na0 iz0 la0 es tehu dk fookn gksus dhj ckr dgh x;h gS tks lgh gks ldrk gS fdUrq foi{khx.k }kjk oknh ds lkFk xkyh xykSt vkSj tku ls ekjus dh /kedh rFkk tkfr lwpd 'kCnksa dk iz;ksx fd;k x;k gSA ,slk ekuus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha ik;k tkrk gSA iz’uxr ekeys esa fdlh Lora= lk{kh dks ijhf{kr ugha djk;k x;k gSA ,slh n’kk esa foi{khx.k ds fo:} izFke }"V;k ekeyk ugha curk gSA

¶17

¶18

CRLA No. - 10585 of 2024

¶19

6&fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr iz’uxr vkns’k leqfpr foospuk ij vk/kkfjr gS ftlesa gLr{ksi dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha ik;k tkrk gSA rnuqlkj ;g vihy cyghu gS ,oa fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA 7&rnulqkj ;g vihy fujLr dh tkrh gSA

¶20

(Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.)

¶21

October 13, 2025/A.

¶22

Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Guddu Diwakar v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Guddu Diwakar v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shobhnath Prajapati vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Rohit vs State of U.P. and Another

Nanga Alias Pawan Thakhur vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt Sneha Suman vs State of U.P.and Another

Arti Rajput and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Aasma Khatoon and Another vs State of U.P. and Another