Disposed

Vivek Maurya v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Apr 2025CRLA/1054/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal seeking quashing of a chargesheet and summoning order under IPC and SC/ST Act sections. Quashing refused; appellant permitted to appear before trial court within two weeks for bail to be decided per Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Quashing prayer refused; liberty granted to seek bail before trial court within two weeks, to be decided expeditiously per Satender Kumar Antil.

Vivek Maurya Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko… — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:19703

¶2

Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1054 of 2025 Appellant :- Vivek Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Sarvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned AGA on behalf of the State.

¶5

The present appeal U/S 14 A(1) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed against the chargesheet No.01, dated 14.04.2023 filed against the appellant in Case Crime No.0077/2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 304 IPC and Section 3(1)(Da), 3(1) (Dha) and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act as well as summoning order dated 26.05.2023 issued in Criminal Case No.1989 of 2023 arising out aforesaid case crime.

¶6

Learned counsel for appellant, after arguing the matter at some length, submits that grievance of appellant shall be substantially redressed in case appellant is granted liberty to file bail application before the Court concerned, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" .

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to the Court concerned to consider and decide the applicant's application for bail in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶8

In view of the above, prayer for quashing the chargesheet as well as summoning order is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial Court within two weeks from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra) .

¶9

The application is accordingly disposed of .

¶10

[ Alok Mathur,J. ]

¶11

Order Date :- 8.4.2025 / KR

¶12

Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vivek Maurya v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Maurya v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Uggar and Others vs Additional Commissioner (Administration Second) Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and Others

State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. vs Naseem Akhtar

Suraj vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Bharat Bhushan @ Bharat Bhushan Rai Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Vishal Kumar Tiwari Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Law Lko. and Another

Deena Nath @ Ghuttu and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another