A bare adjournment order in a review application: counsel for opposite party nos. 1 and 2 is on sanctioned leave, so the matter has been listed in the fourth week of January, 2026. It decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 129 of 2024
Faizal Iqbal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| Prabandh Samiti Waqf Jama Masjid Vrindavan Mathura Thru. Representative Azad And 3 Others .. |
...Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Aftab Ahmad |
|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Farhan Habib, Shivang Shrimant Kumar Banerjee |
Dwivedi, |
Court No. - 1
HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Shri Shrimant Kumar Banerjee, learned counsel for opposite party nos.1 and 2 is reported to be on sanctioned leave.
List in the fourth week of January, 2026.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
December 17, 2025
Anand/-
Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Faizal Iqbal
Prabandh Samiti Waqf Jama Masjid Vrindavan Mathura Thru. Representative Azad
Opposite Party Nos. 3 and 4
Rajan Roy
Rajeev Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
