Nainshi Tripathi v. Santosh Kumar Dev Pandey, District Basic Education Officer Barabanki and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil contempt application dismissed as infructuous after applicant's counsel (Sri Ajay Shukla) stated that the writ court's order had already been complied with, leaving nothing to be decided; Court No. 21, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; judge Manjive Shukla; decision date 10.2.2025 (10 February 2025); Neutral Citation No. 2025:AHC-LKO:8425; parties Nainshi Tripathi v. Santosh Kumar Dev Pandey (District Basic Education Officer Barabanki) and another; no statutes cited; no cases cited; no monetary amounts involved.
What did the court decide?
In view of the statement of Sri Ajay Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, that the writ court's order had already been complied with, nothing survives in this application to be decided. ¶¶7