Mahendra Singh Visht and 21 Others v. Vimlesh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt application alleging willful disobedience of a writ order dated 04.02.2025. Court found prima facie matter required consideration and issued notice to the opposite party to comply or show cause.
What did the court decide?
Notice issued to opposite party to comply with the order dated 04.02.2025 or show cause against contempt; matter listed for 09.01.2026.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5810 of 2025
Mahendra Singh Visht And 21 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Vimlesh Kumar .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durga Shanker Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 37
HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
- Instant contempt application has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 04.02.2025 passed by this Court in Writ-A No.1347 of 2025 (Mahendra Singh Visht And 22 Others vs. State of U.P. And 2 Others).
- Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the order passed by this Court has been served upon the opposite party and despite knowledge, compliance has not been made.
- Prima facie, matter requires consideration for contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
- Let notice be issued to the opposite party requiring him, either to comply with the order passed by this Court within a month from the date of receiving the notice and file compliance affidavit on or before the next date fixed or to show cause as to why contempt proceeding should not be drawn against him.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mahendra Singh Visht And 21 Others
- respondent
Vimlesh Kumar
Coram
Dinesh Pathak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CAPL/5810/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court