Contempt application alleging non-compliance of a writ court order. State counsel reported the representation was decided and compliance was effected; applicant conceded the application had become infructuous. The court dismissed it as infructuous and discharged any earlier notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2698 of 2023
Rashmi Singh And Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Shri Ramit Sharma, Commissioner Of Police, Prayagaraj And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kirti Veer Singh, Ravi Shanker Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
December 10, 2025
Muk
Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application survives after the writ court's order dated 21.2.2023 has been complied with.
Rashmi Singh And Others
Shri Ramit Sharma, Commissioner Of Police, Prayagaraj And Others
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
