Satya Prakash Thru. Mukhtaraam Shivam Sharma v. Shri Kamlesh Kumar Goyal Addl. Distt. Maigistrate/ Competent Auth. Urban Land Celling Lko. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-substantive dismissal for want of prosecution (default/non-appearance of counsel) of a civil contempt application before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 8, decided December 1, 2025 by Manish Kumar, J. Applicant: Satya Prakash (through Mukhtaraam Shivam Sharma), represented by Anil Kumar Upadhyay, Anil Kumar Yadav, Diksha Tiwari and Saurabh Upadhyay. Opposite parties: Shri Kamlesh Kumar Goyal, Addl. Distt. Magistrate/Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Lucknow, and another (no counsel listed). Notice, if any, discharged. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no quantum involved; suitable only as a procedural-status reference, not for citation on any legal proposition.
What did the court decide?
The contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution, as neither the learned counsel for the applicant was present nor was any request made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.