Contempt application alleging willful disobedience of a writ order directing payment of compensation for land utilized for public purpose. Court held that since a disputed question of fact existed about land area under a 2006 revenue order, contempt could not lie.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25381
Court No. - 17
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1332 of 2025
Applicant :- Dhuru Narain Shukla Opposite Party :- Mr. Shashank Tripathi Distt. Magistrate Distt Barabanki And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Kumar Singh,Pawan Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
contempt application is misconceived and is accordingly, dismissed .
Order Date :- 2.5.2025 GauraV/-
Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings can be initiated for alleged non-payment of compensation when there is a disputed question of fact regarding the land area.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dhuru Narain Shukla
Mr. Shashank Tripathi Distt. Magistrate Distt Barabanki
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
