A contempt application listed for personal appearance was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the applicant nor counsel appeared despite the respondent having filed a compliance affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1167 of 2024
| Versus Ram Bodh Verma .....Applicant(s) |
|---|
| Sri Ram Prakash Rana, Zila Raksha Krishi Adhikari, Balrampur .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Kumar Rai, Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : |
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case is listed under the heading of "personal appearance".
Case has been called out in the revised list.
Respondent has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record.
Neither the learned counsels for the applicant are present nor any request has been made on their behalf for adjournment of the present case.
In view of the aforesaid, the present case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
December 17, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ram Bodh Verma
Sri Ram Prakash Rana, Zila Raksha Krishi Adhikari, Balrampur
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
